Comparaison : consommation combinée (WLTP) Ford Ranger vs concurrents 2024

1.Generation 1999
Ranger 1. Generation (1. Facelift) 2002
2.Generation 2007
2.Generation (1. Facelift) 2009
Ranger 3. Generation 2011
Ranger 3. Generation (1. Facelift) 2016
Ranger 3. Generation (2. Facelift) 2019
Ranger 4. Generation 2022

Table des matières:

Ford Ranger - Quel est le consommation combinée (wltp) des différents moteurs ?

Moteurs Ford Ranger

(Consommation combinée (WLTP))
Moteurs Ford Ranger
MoteurConsommation combinée (WLTP)
Doppelkabine 2.0 EcoBlue Limited 4x4 125 kW8.4 l/100km
Doppelkabine 2.0 EcoBlue Limited 4x4 {automatic} 125 kW8.7 l/100km
Extrakabine 2.0 EcoBlue Tremor e-4WD {automatic} 151 kW8.8 l/100km
Doppelkabine 2.0 EcoBlue Wildtrack e-4WD {automatic} 151 kW8.8 l/100km
Doppelkabine 3.0 EcoBlue Wildtrack e-4WD {automatic} 177 kW10.1 l/100km
Raptor 2.0 EcoBlue e-4WD {automatic} 154 kW10.6 l/100km
Raptor 3.0 EcoBoost e-4WD {automatic} 212 kW13.8 l/100km
1. Doppelkabine 2.0 EcoBlue Limited 4x4 125 kW 8.4 l/100km
2. Doppelkabine 2.0 EcoBlue Limited 4x4 {automatic} 125 kW 8.7 l/100km
3. Extrakabine 2.0 EcoBlue Tremor e-4WD {automatic} 151 kW 8.8 l/100km
4. Doppelkabine 2.0 EcoBlue Wildtrack e-4WD {automatic} 151 kW 8.8 l/100km
5. Doppelkabine 3.0 EcoBlue Wildtrack e-4WD {automatic} 177 kW 10.1 l/100km
6. Raptor 2.0 EcoBlue e-4WD {automatic} 154 kW 10.6 l/100km
7. Raptor 3.0 EcoBoost e-4WD {automatic} 212 kW 13.8 l/100km

Variantes

Variantes de Ford Ranger: Ranger vs. Ranger Raptor

(Consommation combinée (WLTP))
Consommation combinée (WLTP): Variantes de Ford Ranger
Nom de la varianteConsommation combinée (WLTP)
Ranger13.8 l/100km
Ranger Raptor10.6 l/100km
1. Ranger 13.8 l/100km
2. Ranger Raptor 10.6 l/100km

Le consommation combinée (wltp) comparé à d'autres modèles de Ford

Ford Ranger vs autres voitures actuelles de Ford

(Consommation combinée (WLTP))
Consommation combinée (WLTP): Ranger vs. autres modèles de Ford
Nom de la varianteConsommation combinée (WLTP)
Explorer 3.0 EcoBoost Plug-in-Hybrid Platinum {automatic} 336 kW3.1 l/100km
Kuga Active 2.5 PHEV Titanium CVT 178 kW5.3 l/100km
Focus Turnier ST 206 kW5.4 l/100km
Focus Active Turnier ST 206 kW5.4 l/100km
Focus Active Turnier Turnier ST 206 kW5.5 l/100km
Focus Turnier Turnier ST 206 kW5.5 l/100km
Mondeo {sedan} Turnier 2.0 EcoBlue Business Edition {automatic} 140 kW5.6 l/100km
Mondeo Turnier Turnier 2.0 EcoBlue Business Edition {automatic} 140 kW5.7 l/100km
Ka+ 1.5 TDCi Cool & Connect 70 kW5.8 l/100km
Puma ST 147 kW5.8 l/100km
Kuga 2.5 PHEV Titanium CVT 178 kW6.4 l/100km
Tourneo Connect 2.0 EcoBlue Sport {automatic} 90 kW6.4 l/100km
Edge 2.0 EcoBlue Bi-Turbo Titanium 4x4 Automatik 175 kW6.5 l/100km
Ka+ Active 1.5 TDCi Cool & Connect 70 kW6.5 l/100km
Puma ST ST 147 kW6.6 l/100km
Tourneo Courier 1.0 EcoBoost Start/Stopp Trend 92 kW6.7 l/100km
Fiesta ST 1.5 EcoBoost X 147 kW6.7 l/100km
Transit Custom Kombi Kombi 320 L2 2.0 EcoBlue Trend 81 kW7.2 l/100km
Tourneo Custom 340 L2 2.5 Duratec PHEV Sport {automatic} 171 kW7.4 l/100km
Mondeo Turnier 2.0 EcoBlue Business Edition {automatic} 140 kW7.4 l/100km
Focus ST Turnier ST 206 kW8.0 l/100km
Focus ST Turnier Turnier ST 206 kW8.0 l/100km
S-MAX 2.0 EcoBlue Bi-Turbo ST-Line {automatic} 177 kW8.4 l/100km
Transit Custom Nugget Kombi 320 L2 2.0 EcoBlue Trend 81 kW9.0 l/100km
Ranger Raptor Raptor 3.0 EcoBoost e-4WD {automatic} 212 kW10.6 l/100km
Mustang Fastback Convertible 5.0 Ti-VCT V8 GT {automatic} 328 kW12.0 l/100km
Mustang Convertible Convertible 5.0 Ti-VCT V8 GT {automatic} 328 kW12.0 l/100km
Bronco 2.7 Ti-VCT EcoBoost Outer Banks 4x4 {automatic} 246 kW13.4 l/100km
GT 475kW 2017 (a) 482 kW13.7 l/100km
Ranger Raptor 3.0 EcoBoost e-4WD {automatic} 212 kW13.8 l/100km
Explorer EV AWD 250 kW15.5 l/100km
Mustang Mach-E Rally 358 kW17.2 l/100km
E-Transit Custom {VAN} Kombi 320 L2 2.0 EcoBlue Trend 81 kW22.4 l/100km
E-Transit Custom Kombi Kombi 320 L2 2.0 EcoBlue Trend 81 kW22.6 l/100km
E-Tourneo Custom 340 L2 2.5 Duratec PHEV Sport {automatic} 171 kW25.6 l/100km
E-Transit {VAN} Kombi 350 L2 2.0 TDCi Trend 77 kW26.4 l/100km
1. Explorer 3.0 EcoBoost Plug-in-Hybrid Platinum {automatic} 336 kW 3.1 l/100km
2. Kuga Active 2.5 PHEV Titanium CVT 178 kW 5.3 l/100km
3. Focus Turnier ST 206 kW 5.4 l/100km
4. Focus Active Turnier ST 206 kW 5.4 l/100km
5. Focus Active Turnier Turnier ST 206 kW 5.5 l/100km
6. Focus Turnier Turnier ST 206 kW 5.5 l/100km
7. Mondeo {sedan} Turnier 2.0 EcoBlue Business Edition {automatic} 140 kW 5.6 l/100km
8. Mondeo Turnier Turnier 2.0 EcoBlue Business Edition {automatic} 140 kW 5.7 l/100km
9. Ka+ 1.5 TDCi Cool & Connect 70 kW 5.8 l/100km
10. Puma ST 147 kW 5.8 l/100km
11. Kuga 2.5 PHEV Titanium CVT 178 kW 6.4 l/100km
12. Tourneo Connect 2.0 EcoBlue Sport {automatic} 90 kW 6.4 l/100km
13. Edge 2.0 EcoBlue Bi-Turbo Titanium 4x4 Automatik 175 kW 6.5 l/100km
14. Ka+ Active 1.5 TDCi Cool & Connect 70 kW 6.5 l/100km
15. Puma ST ST 147 kW 6.6 l/100km
16. Tourneo Courier 1.0 EcoBoost Start/Stopp Trend 92 kW 6.7 l/100km
17. Fiesta ST 1.5 EcoBoost X 147 kW 6.7 l/100km
18. Transit Custom Kombi Kombi 320 L2 2.0 EcoBlue Trend 81 kW 7.2 l/100km
19. Tourneo Custom 340 L2 2.5 Duratec PHEV Sport {automatic} 171 kW 7.4 l/100km
20. Mondeo Turnier 2.0 EcoBlue Business Edition {automatic} 140 kW 7.4 l/100km
21. Focus ST Turnier ST 206 kW 8.0 l/100km
22. Focus ST Turnier Turnier ST 206 kW 8.0 l/100km
23. S-MAX 2.0 EcoBlue Bi-Turbo ST-Line {automatic} 177 kW 8.4 l/100km
24. Transit Custom Nugget Kombi 320 L2 2.0 EcoBlue Trend 81 kW 9.0 l/100km
25. Ranger Raptor Raptor 3.0 EcoBoost e-4WD {automatic} 212 kW 10.6 l/100km
26. Mustang Fastback Convertible 5.0 Ti-VCT V8 GT {automatic} 328 kW 12.0 l/100km
27. Mustang Convertible Convertible 5.0 Ti-VCT V8 GT {automatic} 328 kW 12.0 l/100km
28. Bronco 2.7 Ti-VCT EcoBoost Outer Banks 4x4 {automatic} 246 kW 13.4 l/100km
29. GT 475kW 2017 (a) 482 kW 13.7 l/100km
30. Ranger Raptor 3.0 EcoBoost e-4WD {automatic} 212 kW 13.8 l/100km
31. Explorer EV AWD 250 kW 15.5 l/100km
32. Mustang Mach-E Rally 358 kW 17.2 l/100km
33. E-Transit Custom {VAN} Kombi 320 L2 2.0 EcoBlue Trend 81 kW 22.4 l/100km
34. E-Transit Custom Kombi Kombi 320 L2 2.0 EcoBlue Trend 81 kW 22.6 l/100km
35. E-Tourneo Custom 340 L2 2.5 Duratec PHEV Sport {automatic} 171 kW 25.6 l/100km
36. E-Transit {VAN} Kombi 350 L2 2.0 TDCi Trend 77 kW 26.4 l/100km

Comment le consommation combinée (wltp) du Ford Ranger se compare-t-il à ses concurrents les plus proches ?

Ford Ranger vs. voitures similaires

(Consommation combinée (WLTP))
Consommation combinée (WLTP): Ford Ranger vs. voitures similaires
Modèle de voitureConsommation combinée (WLTP)
Suzuki S-Cross 1.4 Boosterjet Hybrid 20225.3 l/100km
VW T-Roc 1.0 TSI OPF 20226.0 l/100km
Opel Grandland 1.2 DI Turbo 20226.1 l/100km
VW Tiguan 1.5 TSI OPF 20206.2 l/100km
Renault Austral Mild Hybrid 140 20226.2 l/100km
Citroen C5 Aircross PureTech 130 Stop&Start 20226.2 l/100km
Peugeot 5008 1.2 PureTech 130 20216.3 l/100km
Ford Kuga 1.5 EcoBoost 20196.6 l/100km
Ford Fiesta ST 1.5 EcoBoost 20226.7 l/100km
KIA Sportage 1.6 GDI 20226.7 l/100km
Mazda CX-5 SKYACTIV-G 165 20216.8 l/100km
SEAT Tarraco 1.5 TSI ACT 20197.4 l/100km
Isuzu D-Max Single Cab 1.9 Diesel 20208.1 l/100km
SsangYong Musso 2.2 Diesel 20228.4 l/100km
Ford Ranger Doppelkabine 2.0 EcoBlue 20228.4 l/100km
VW Nutzfahrzeuge Amarok Doppelkabine 2.0 TDI SCR 20238.6 l/100km
Toyota GR86 2.4 20228.7 l/100km
Subaru BRZ 2.4 20238.8 l/100km
Toyota Hilux Single Cab 2.4 D-4D 20209.2 l/100km
1. Suzuki S-Cross 1.4 Boosterjet Hybrid 2022 5.3 l/100km
2. VW T-Roc 1.0 TSI OPF 2022 6.0 l/100km
3. Opel Grandland 1.2 DI Turbo 2022 6.1 l/100km
4. VW Tiguan 1.5 TSI OPF 2020 6.2 l/100km
5. Renault Austral Mild Hybrid 140 2022 6.2 l/100km
6. Citroen C5 Aircross PureTech 130 Stop&Start 2022 6.2 l/100km
7. Peugeot 5008 1.2 PureTech 130 2021 6.3 l/100km
8. Ford Kuga 1.5 EcoBoost 2019 6.6 l/100km
9. Ford Fiesta ST 1.5 EcoBoost 2022 6.7 l/100km
10. KIA Sportage 1.6 GDI 2022 6.7 l/100km
11. Mazda CX-5 SKYACTIV-G 165 2021 6.8 l/100km
12. SEAT Tarraco 1.5 TSI ACT 2019 7.4 l/100km
13. Isuzu D-Max Single Cab 1.9 Diesel 2020 8.1 l/100km
14. SsangYong Musso 2.2 Diesel 2022 8.4 l/100km
15. Ford Ranger Doppelkabine 2.0 EcoBlue 2022 8.4 l/100km
16. VW Nutzfahrzeuge Amarok Doppelkabine 2.0 TDI SCR 2023 8.6 l/100km
17. Toyota GR86 2.4 2022 8.7 l/100km
18. Subaru BRZ 2.4 2023 8.8 l/100km
19. Toyota Hilux Single Cab 2.4 D-4D 2020 9.2 l/100km

Voitures similaires

VW Nutzfahrzeuge Amarok
Consommation combinée (WLTP):
+2% (8.6 l/100km)


Comparer
Isuzu D-Max
Consommation combinée (WLTP):
-4% (8.1 l/100km)


Comparer
SsangYong Musso
Consommation combinée (WLTP):
0% (8.4 l/100km)


Comparer
Toyota Hilux
Consommation combinée (WLTP):
+10% (9.2 l/100km)


Comparer
Ford Mustang
Consommation combinée (WLTP):
-100% (0.0 l/100km)


Comparer
Subaru BRZ
Consommation combinée (WLTP):
+5% (8.8 l/100km)


Comparer
Nissan Qashqai
Consommation combinée (WLTP):
-100% (0.0 l/100km)


Comparer
Toyota GT86/GR86
Consommation combinée (WLTP):
+4% (8.7 l/100km)


Comparer
Peugeot 5008
Consommation combinée (WLTP):
-25% (6.3 l/100km)


Comparer
Citroen C5 Aircross
Consommation combinée (WLTP):
-26% (6.2 l/100km)


Comparer

Compare with ...

TOPlist